Avengers: Age of Ultron

[Batman Heisenberg]

Official discussion for the upcoming Marvel teamup.

[Straw Hats]

It's gonna be awesome, nuff said. Can't wait to get some more Hulk and Hawkeye since we haven't seen them since the first Avengers.

The adding of Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch is kind of meh IMO. Don't really know of there characters that well, but I'm sure they will fit right in.

[Dion]

The only thing that disappoints me is that Antman isn't in this. Or even hank pym at all. But I guess using tony stark to build ultron is just as good since it'll follow with Ironman 3.

[Batman Heisenberg]

I am super excited for it, I just find it weird that people are okay(as am I...) with introducing 5-6 major characters, while Batman v Superman is only doing 2-4 and it gets more shit. Just an observation.

[Dion]

I am super excited for it, I just find it weird that people are okay(as am I...) with introducing 5-6 major characters, while Batman v Superman is only doing 2-4 and it gets more shit. Just an observation.

Probably because of the thousands of rumours that were following the speculation of Batman vs Superman. They were pretty straight forward with the 2nd Avengers movie.

[Batman Heisenberg]

Probably because of the thousands of rumours that were following the speculation of Batman vs Superman. They were pretty straight forward with the 2nd Avengers movie.

Even WITH the speculation, which usually always states it would be a small role/cameo, it would be less crowded than Avengers 2. Besides the speculation, it's primary focus is Batman and Supes, WW in some unknown capacity, and Lex being big baddie. Everyone else is VERY minor. In Avengers 2(and trust me, I DON'T think it's bloated.) it has to establish the twins, Baron Von Strucker in some capacity, Ultron and his creation, the original six avengers, and Hulk and Hawkeye especially, since they weren't in phase two. Again, I don't think it's bloated, and think Joss will do great, but that seems like a lot more than BvS, and I am trying to point the bit of hypocrisy!

[Dion]

Some movies pull it off well and some don't. We saw the first avengers movie able to pull off a multitude of characters very well so adding in more shouldn't be that big of an issue.

[xxDeadxPoolxx]

The reason why the Batman/Superman movie will end up being shit is because they are rushing the Justice League movie. Each of the Avengers(minus Black Widow) had AMPLE build up. DC can't even do a stand alone Wonder Woman movie.

I'm optimistic that Affleck will do well as Batman. The rest of the movie is going to flop hard.

[Batman Heisenberg]

The reason why the Batman/Superman movie will end up being shit is because they are rushing the Justice League movie. Each of the Avengers(minus Black Widow) had AMPLE build up. DC can't even do a stand alone Wonder Woman movie.

I'm optimistic that Affleck will do well as Batman. The rest of the movie is going to flop hard.

How is it rushing? Because it isn't doing it Marvel's way? Don't get me wrong the MCU is genius, but it isn't the only way you can do Cinematic Universes.

[xxDeadxPoolxx]

There's no build up/introduction to anyone else with regards to Justice League outside of Batman/Superman. Think of it from a non-comic book person. They decide to go and watch it, and they can't really follow it because there's very little information.

"Hey, whose that woman Super heroine? What's her back story?"

The way Marvel did it was smart. The way DC(or who ever has the rights) is dumb. You cannot rush/sandwich additional characters that are supposed to be part of a bigger storyline into the 2nd Superman movie. If it was just Superman/Batman, that'd be fine.