
Originally Posted by
R<3PTAR
Hey Castiel you got no response because I was offline.
Anyways you want constructive here goes. Nicely.
The rules, its a good first step but it needs some overhauling, mods are still picking and choosing who to punish and how to punish them, things are not being done fairly and people are going to still take advantage of their positions within this site, or their friendships on this site to avoid blame and punishment.
Keep the rules, they are bloody brilliant, a few could be tweaked and added but I like them. But how about we change some things, like for instance instead of just automatically banning a member, or giving a warning to one person and not the other I think we should set up a Private, court style section. Now obviously certain cases, blatant trolling, advertising ect. don't need the court but when we are talking about things like what happened recently, that needs something like this. People do not feel there voices are heard unless they MAKE their voice heard. Honestly its true nothing was done until the mods hand was forced, the problem could have been stopped numerous times there were at least 4 different GMs online at various points and yet it took a massive sitewide fight to even bring the topic into the mods heads.
Now if we had a private court section maybe this would not happen. People would feel like they could take their issues to court and actually have their opinons and facts heard and seen before a decision is made. Right now that doesnt happen and thats why certain members feel the mods don't do anything.
How would this work, if two forumers have an issue with each other one or the other or both could bring this up THROUGH PM to a mod or admin online. This mod or Admin would than begin the process. The only members who would have access to the court section would be those with the issue and a select group of UNBIASED members.
Those could include
Dion
LAWL
and a couple other trusted members. People we know will not put their personal biases into a decision. I trust Dion and LAWL to actually read and review the evidence and make a decision based on facts not personal opinions.
Both sides would have 24 - 48 hours (things need to happen quickly) to present their cases, they will than be locked out of the section while the judges deliberate, the judges will write a report and PM it to both parties and the section will be cleared so the next case can be heard.
Does this make sense? I doubt it will happen but I think it would stop a lot of problems and fix a lot of the bias this site undoubtedly has for and against certain members.